“anybody who thinks that there is more scientific evidence for evolution is a highly ignorant and misinformed individual.”

I’m afraid that would include an awful lot of scientists, a sizeable chunk of the UK population and the Roman Catholic and Anglican churches, which both accept it.

Speaking personally, I’ve never come across ANY evidence that convinced me of the truth of Creationism, and I have looked into the subject. Everytime I read one of those arguments lists I find something that doesn’t ring true. For my money, Evolution is the best supported theory.
——–
You will find that there is far more evidence against evolution than for it.

My research suggests you’ll find plenty of evidence in support of Evolution, a quick search on Google (also Talk Origins) will give you plenty of reading. Further to this, the list of gaps in the evidence grows smaller with time, this would seem to point to only one eventual conclusion.

I have seen plenty of refutations of the counter arguments to Evolution. And the point about deceit and trickery, if you’ll indulge me, I’d like to refer you to “Paluxy River“. Another look at the validity of Creationism can be found here.
——–
From a scientific point of view, all the evidence points to something (I don’t care if it is any sort of god or whatever) having created everything we see on a day-to-day basis.

Oh, there’s no argument that *something* created it, but I see no evidence of a creator and some good logical arguments against one: Dear Theologian, for example. The Big Bang is looking like the best current model for the universe.