Clouded vision
I saw the film “Angels and Demons” last night, it’s a good film and I recommend it. I’ll not spoil the plot, I hate it when people do that, but something in there got me thinking this morning. I’ve come to believe that we have a tendency to defend fixed ideas rather then living truths.
In Buddhism we know that the cause of our suffering is that we tend to form crystallised ideas of the world and pretend they’re the reality, then get all hurt and confused when the ever changing world has moved on.
For example, we have people defending the idea that climate change is a fraud based, one look at the seasons and the state of the arctic ice is enough to make you say “hang on a minute…”. But we tend to take our concepts, our ideas and try to make the world fit them.
In IT circles, we have various Operating System technologies which are considered by some proponents to be superior in all aspects to the others. They’ll insist blindly that they are right, come what may. The truth is that the choice of technologies adopted should be driven by the needs in reality, not the ideology in your head.
In religion, we have conflicts between doctrines and never mind the friction between science and religion. Many people on all sides of the divide are busily defending their doctrine, not looking into what is real.
I was going to query the reasons we defend the ideas, are they the right ones? Are we defending out of belief in their rightness or terror of the consequences if they’re wrong?
I question whether we should be defending them at all.





There’s also the comfort factor, isn’t there? We tend to cling to what is familiar simply because we’re comfortable with it. No particular terror, just the easy course. Thanks for the good thoughts, as usual…