<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Quiet Watercourse &#187; Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/category/evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk</link>
	<description>Spirituality, Technology, Skepticism, bring it on...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not so different</title>
		<link>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/2010/04/27/not-so-different/</link>
		<comments>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/2010/04/27/not-so-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this story to be very interesting indeed.  It&#8217;s a tenet of quite a few religions that humanity is somehow special, created by a God, maybe even in the image of that God.  As someone who accepts Evolution, I really don&#8217;t buy into that idea, and I&#8217;ve not seen anything that even begins to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I found <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/04/chimps-grieve-over-dead-relative.html">this story</a> to be very interesting  indeed.  It&#8217;s a tenet of quite a few religions that humanity is somehow  special, created by a God, maybe even in the image of that God.  As  someone who accepts Evolution, I really don&#8217;t buy into that idea, and I&#8217;ve  not seen anything that even begins to convince me otherwise.</div>
<p></p>
<div>When we have a story like this it casts doubt on  that idea of divine origin, but it&#8217;s not the first time something like this  has been observed, and not just in Chimpanzees but also in Elephants.  So, it seems that the observational evidence is  mounting in favour of the idea that we are simply another animal species,  sometimes better and often worse than those who walk on all fours.  But  the mounting evidence that we are part of the animal kingdom isn&#8217;t a bad  thing, it offers us the chance to reassess who we are and also how we  approach the world.  I also think that does offer us a certain quiet  dignity.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/2010/04/27/not-so-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emotional decisions</title>
		<link>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/2009/10/17/emotional-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/2009/10/17/emotional-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got involved in a debate with a work colleague a week or so ago about the death penalty, he was for it and I was against.  It was interesting to notice the faith in Science to give the right answers in such a case, almost unquestioning, though I&#8217;ll ponder the question of Science as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got involved in a debate with a work colleague a week or so ago about the death penalty, he was for it and I was against.  It was interesting to notice the faith in Science to give the right answers in such a case, almost unquestioning, though I&#8217;ll ponder the question of Science as a religion at a later date.</p>
<p>What was interesting, was that his position seemed to be emotionally chosen, and this isn&#8217;t the first time I&#8217;ve seen this.  I&#8217;m very sure everyone reading this has come across people making decisions emotionally or holding positions on issues emotionally.  For example, the debate on climate change seems to be such an issue, with much shrillness and name calling, and that does the subject no justice given the massive importance of what they&#8217;re discussing.  I also recall Richard Dawkins telling us in his book &#8220;The God Delusion&#8221;, of some very senior scientists who, while holding no religious faith themselves, go to church or synagogue out of a feeling of &#8220;supporting the team&#8221;<em>[1]</em>.</p>
<p>So why do we have emotions?  The study of the evolution of emotions began with Charles Darwin in his book &#8220;The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals&#8221;, which was published in 1872.  Darwin noticed that even in people who are born blind, many facial emotional expressions remain the same as in sighted people, research since has shown that many emotional expressions (joy, anger, etc) are common across even isolated cultures.</p>
<p>So why use them in decision making?  The answer, in my opinion, lies in the value of fast decision making.  Dr Dawkins covers this in great detail in the God Delusion, and I highly recommend that book to everyone.  In short, we often need to make quick fairly reliable decisions, if we take time to consider our actions thoroughly, then the odds are we&#8217;d be dead long before we made a decision.  Sometimes, you need to act very quickly indeed, and our emotions cut in before our thoughts <em>[2]</em>, how often have you acted first and then stopped to think?  This is the nub of it, emotions hit first and then we override our emotions with complex thought.</p>
<p>So coming back to where I started, is it so surprising that we take emotional stances?  How often do we hear the question &#8220;How do you feel about that?&#8221; not &#8220;What do you think of that?&#8221;, so I did an informal experiment.  I put the phrase &#8220;How do you feel about that issue?&#8221; into our Google overlord.  Interesting results, both with and without the quotes, showing a range of subjects in both searches that should not be left to feelings to decide.  I&#8217;m not saying we should abandon empathy and emotion, far from it, but my searches turned up health care reform, abortion, stem cell research, choosing the gender of children, these things need more careful consideration.</p>
<p>I think we as a species need to engage in a little consciousness raising here, stop letting our emotions control us and start thinking with our heads.  Not only the use of Science, but the Buddhist emphasis on mindfulness and the Taoist emphasis on awareness all serve to lead us in this direction, I suppose that there&#8217;s hope for us yet, eh?</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/God-Delusion-Richard-Dawkins/dp/055277331X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1255776215&amp;sr=1-1">The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.  2007 Black Swan edition. ISBN 978-0-552-77331-7</a>.</p>
<p>[2] <a href="http://www.calresco.org/ethics.htm">Ethics as Emotions &#8211; An Evolutionary Approach.  Chris Lucas (date unknown)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quietwatercourse.co.uk/2009/10/17/emotional-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
