One of the things I’ve learned on my journey through Taoism and Buddhism is the futility of intellectual striving, I’d realised that it’s often better not to force the mind, but to let it take its own time.
I’m reminded of the idea the we have two parts to our minds, one like a searchlight and one like an illuminating candle. The searchlight mind is the part of our mind that is calculating and intellectual, logical. The other, less focussed mind is more intuitive and less logical, in the West I really don’t think we trust this one as much, which is a big mistake in my view.
I’ve relearned this lesson the hard way as a consequence of having spent a few weeks revisiting my old Anglican thought, which led to a re-assessment of why I left. In short it’s been mentally stressful, and is an experience I’m not eager to repeat. The problem is that as I’ve said previously it just seems to be one huge argument based on essentially unresolvable questions, in essence a wilderness of opinions. The Buddha had a series of questions he would not answer, when drawn, he said they were like a net and weren’t really relevant to what he was trying to do.
He compared our situation there to that of a man shot with an arrow, who refuses all treatment till he knows all about the arrow, the bow it was fired from, the character and caste of the archer, etc, etc. This man will die of his wounds before he gets any answers, and what good does that do him? Our situation is urgent and lots of speculative arguments do us no service at all in resolving it.
The searchlight part of our mind is the part that runs after answers, often heedlessly. The less focussed more “illuminating” (and never were quotes more needed) part is our inner Sage or Buddha, who if we will only listen, can save us so much trouble.




