I started reading “Confession of a Buddhist Atheist” by Stephen Batchelor the other day. It’s an excellent read so far, and I am starting to see things of interest. Especially as his questioning, skeptical frame of mind seems similar to my own views.
I find it interesting that Zen Buddhist thought should be considered heretical and outlawed in Tibet. I find it fascinating that a Buddhist sect should hold belief in spirits and the supernatural, even though the Buddha’s stance was skeptical.
I have recently starting visiting a local New Kadampa centre in order to try to find out more about them. All of the other local Buddhist centres are much further away or are just difficult to approach. The New Kadampa approach is Tibetan in origin, with some supernatural elements and this leads me to a few thoughts.
I think that the heresy (or otherwise) of the various approaches to Buddhism is up to the individual, not a priesthood. After all, we were warned about arguments from authority by a certain someone! The question of the supernatural and gods is simply one for an agnostic skepticism, after all where is the evidence? You can’t just state that the world is a certain way, then expect everyone to accept it without proof. Buddhists are supposed to be critics and skeptics, so let’s criticise!
What I can see developing, what I see a need for, is a very Western style of secular Buddhism. The existing traditions have much to offer and draw on, but they’re very much a product of their culture and times. I look forward to seeing what the west produces.

