Tag Archives: Buddhist - Page 2

Us Through a Lens

I had an interesting moment the other day, interesting and somewhat unsettling.  I realised that the way I was being seen by someone wasn’t the way I’d thought.  This lead me to a train of thought.

We all put a lot of effort into how we come across, we care how we’re seen by others.  This goes to various degrees, depending on the situation and the individual.  But at what point does this behaviour become unethical?  Is it, in spite of our best efforts, ultimately futile?

No matter how carefully we craft our public faces, how carefully we choose our words, they will be seen through someone else’s lens.  The persons you and I are, are the result of our lifelong Karma; choice after choice, event after event.  This is as true of the person you project to the world as it is of the person I am, as I watch your actions and hear your words.  We see each other through the lenses of our Karma.

Ultimately I cannot control how you see me, too much depends on the lens through which you view me.  For me to try and try, ultimately results in me taking (or trying to take) too much control over your perceptions.  Thus taking what is not freely given and violating a precept.

For example, I support and have written Free Software.  I do this because I wish have more control of the software that runs my computer; I wrote SitQuietly for the Linux platform because I wanted to give something back to the community, however small, for all the good their software had done me.

But, through someone else’s eyes, am I the enemy?  No matter how compassionate my motives and aims?  Think not? Look again….

When using open source makes you an enemy of the state.

Should Open Source Be An Enemy Of The State?

My entire Karma led me to this point, if you are an intellectual property lobbyist or an advocate of certain proprietary software companies then you will quite possibly see me as the enemy.  Whether I want you to or not.  But drawing on my point above, for me to go too far in trying to change your mind isn’t just unethical, it’s unskilful.  At what point does it cause suffering for us both?  I’ll also wager the attempt will fail.  So it would seem easier for me to present myself as you find me, and simply allow you the room to make your mind up then live and let live.  No, not just better, more ethical, more skilful.

Interesting train of thought, isn’t it?

Science and Buddhism

Now here’s an interesting piece. “The Neural Buddhists” is an opinion piece in the New York Times, which caught my attention and I have to say I find myself in agreement with the author.

I’ve long felt that hardcore materialism doesn’t have all the answers, but at the same time neither does hardcore bible thumping theism. My focus has always been in the direction of a flexible positive spirituality, not restrictive guilt mongering or the complete denial of our spiritual side, neither fear nor denial seem particularly useful to me.

We have had scientific evidence backing the positive effect of meditation, and after reading the NYT piece above, I’ve got a definite feeling that this is going to get very interesting!

Samurai and Scripture.

I’ve talked about my views on the finger pointing at the moon before, but this was a nice surprise.  I’ve been reading “The Religion of The Samurai”, a treatise on Zen written in 1913 by by Kaiten Nukariya.
There is a section on why scripture is no more than waste paper, which echoes my sentiments, though I personally feel that this sentiment extends far beyond the Buddhist scriptures to all religious scriptures regardless of creed or canon:  They’re a nice place to start, but you wouldn’t want to live there.

This quote is from the beginning of Chapter 3:

“Zen is based on the highest spiritual plane attained by Shakya Muni himself. It can only be realized by one who has attained the same plane. To describe it in full by means of words is beyond the power even of Gotama himself. It is for this reason that the author of Lankavatara-sutra insists that Shakya Muni spoke no word through his long career of forty-nine years as a religious teacher, and that of Mahaprajñaparamita-sutra also express the same opinion. The Scripture is no more nor less than the finger pointing to the moon of Buddhahood. When we recognize the moon and enjoy its benign beauty, the finger is of no use. As the finger has no brightness whatever, so the Scripture has no holiness whatever. The Scripture is religious currency representing spiritual wealth. It does not matter whether money be gold, or sea-shells, or cows. It is a mere substitute. What it stands for is of paramount importance. Away with your stone-knife! Do not watch the stake against which a running hare once struck its head and died. Do not wait for another hare. Another may not come for ever. Do not cut the side of the boat out of which you dropped your sword to mark where it sunk. The boat is ever moving on. The Canon is the window through which we observe the grand scenery of spiritual nature. To hold communion directly with it we must get out of the window. It is a mere stray fly that is always buzzing within it, struggling to get out. Those who spend most of their lives in the study of the Scriptures, arguing and explaining with hair-splitting reasonings, and attain no higher plane in spirituality, are religious flies good for nothing but their buzzing about the nonsensical technicalities. It is on this account that Rin-zai declared:  ‘The twelve divisions of the Buddhist Canon are nothing better than waste paper.’”

This sentiment is why I have little time for religious debates or the technicalities of scripture, stop arguing over trifles in books of dubious authorship, we know we need to progress spiritually … so get on with it!

The Religion of The Samurai is available for download here.

Human Darkness

I’ve been a little snowed under technically of late, but now I’ve got Debian Testing installed and rocking, I’m back and I’d like to muse on a post that Lewis made over on A Barefootman about Shadow.

It’s important to see the parts of ourselves we keep in the shadows, the problem is we can sometimes fall into the trap of over emphasising these parts. To use Lewis’s examples, the hedonist. I don’t generally do clubs, but I’ve let that part of myself out of the shadows a few times. Usually I woke up poorer and nursing a bad head and stomach. It can actually ruin a weekend, and they call this “having fun”?

I feel that it’s important to allow these things to settle into a balance, by all means let the intellectual out, but in the proper forum. Let the hedonist play, but don’t get silly.

My own focus on the shadows has pointed at far darker aspects of ourselves, anger, violence, jealousy and others. I feel it is a great loss to a person to deny that these things exist in each and every one of us. These aspects of ourselves can serve to remind us to be mindful, to cleave to the middle path, almost like a form of mental Judo, though of course you have to catch yourself in time.

As part of my ongoing wandering on the Buddhist path, I’ve been considering things and trying to see through the hype. I’m going to go out on a limb here. Recently I wrote about my complete opposition to Capital Punishment, I’d like to return to a quote from that article.

I’ve been reading some of the letters written to newspapers calling for Capital Punishment to be reintroduced, the language is normally very much aimed at the readers emotions, the murderers are always “heinous” and “inhuman” or “monstrous”, I’ll leave my views on the “inhuman” part till another day.

I feel that this is the right time to clarify that quote. Let’s think about animals. Every day in the animal kingdom, there are examples of killing and other acts that would quite rightly arouse the wrath of the law in Human society. The major difference between Humanity and the rest of the animal kingdom (note the words “rest of”, it’s a very important point) is our capacity.

We are possessed of a greater capacity than other animals, we can reach so much higher. In fact our abilities have grown to the point that Humanity could be reasonably be considered a force of nature, which is why I feel we need to pay more attention to spirituality in the moment in a practical sense. My focus here is going to be more on an individual level, our intelligence gives us the capability for reaching much higher altruism, compassion and spirituality are three examples. But capacity goes both ways, we can also sink lower.

So when someone says a particular murderer (for example) is “inhuman”, my response to that is the thought “I really can’t think of any other animal that would commit that act for that reason”. We have acts of murder, cannibalism and infanticide every day in the natural world, but that comes from evolutionary pressure. For example, a lion that takes over a pride generally kills any young he can find, this is to better secure his genetic legacy, not for kicks.

A Human will however, that’s the difference, we can be the best of animals, but also the worst. I feel that for those of us who aspire to the middle path it’s imperative we acknowledge that honestly.

Virtual and skeptical

For me, questioning is a large part of spirituality, I feel that an unexamined belief is not worth holding.  That’s a large part of what I like about Buddhism, that spirit of enquiry and examination, in fact I was pleasantly surprised to find a virtual Sangha in Second Life which feels exactly the same way.

The Skeptical Buddhists Sangha is a place for Buddhists (and anyone else who wants to drop in and talk on the subject) to meet in Second Life.   I have to say it’s very useful to have them there, I’m finding that Second Life is a very useful tool for allowing communities to form and interact in a new way that I’ve not quite seen anywhere else.  I’ve been involved in some truly stimulating discussion meetings in the Sangha and have to say it’s certainly helped me along the path.

As an aside, I’m finding Second Life to be more useful when viewed as an enhancement to my Real Life and given a balance with that as appropriate.  I try not to spend more time there than I feel appropriate and always try to bear in mind my reasons for being there.